The amount of ignorance in this post is astounding, good to know that your knowledge of these faiths extent to what the internetz has told you or some other basic information from a quick chapter in school.
I was referring to his post, what I listed was a simplified version of what he said. He denied evolution, denied other human species, denied that humans ever used caves for shelter. That is quite silly with all the scientific proof we have today of these things.
1.) The tools used by scientists to determine age of something is broken. By this I mean you can take a fresh piece of paper and put it through certain conditions and with the scientists dating tech it will turn up as billions of years old, so we have absolutely no evidence for life to exist for millions of years.(All the information I have given in this thread about science came from credited scientists who worked their whole life stuying this stuff, so you have no say over if I am crazy, @Sanogono because my science is just as much creditable as yours.
)
Since you have decided that the calculations of the scientists is wrong, how old is the human race and earth then?1.) The tools used by scientists to determine age of something is broken. By this I mean you can take a fresh piece of paper and put it through certain conditions and with the scientists dating tech it will turn up as billions of years old, so we have absolutely no evidence for life to exist for millions of years.(All the information I have given in this thread about science came from credited scientists who worked their whole life stuying this stuff, so you have no say over if I am crazy, @Sanogono because my science is just as much creditable as yours.
2.)yes.
3.)I don't know about the polar bears, I haven't done much research about how animals got where they are, but I can say animals don't have "useless" parts as evolution suggests.(lots of research done to prove this, by scientists who had the goal of finding out the truth) for example evolutionists said eyelashes, our spine tail and other parts of the human body were deemed "useless" and other scientists found many uses for those parts that would horribly afflict the human race if they weren't there.
4.)It never rained, I said it was always constantly misting, that means you get fresh water constantly.
5-6.)back to #1.
edit:So unless science finds a better way of dating things, you are just as crazy as me.
hmmph, how would I know? I just said the only dating method is broken. @EvilThor Yes it is, I discussed this with a scientist friend of mine and he knows what he's talking about. He mentioned that weathering and the effect of water on an object changes the amount of that C14 drastically, and there are so many other factors that contribute to change in the amount of C14 in an object that that method is not feasible for calling the data collected by it correct.
It is a lot more complicated than that, since the accuracy of Radiocarbon Dating is affected by both a multitude of atmospheric conditions as well as human contamination(like all the nuclear testing... mmmhh). Some of it can be determined for better accuracy and some of it not so much. It also depends on the number of samples they can obtain for better accuracy.
No person or people on earth can accurately answer that EtKEnn. All we have are the best of scientific theorem and those with religious faith to try to explain things like that. Trying to say that we Humans have been around for 8,000 years or 200,000 years is the same as saying we have been around 4 billion years-- we just could not know. Human beings have a need for expanding our knowledge, it improves our ability to survive as a species. It gives us a sense of satisfaction to feel like we know something more than we did before. We have progressed to a point where we do not need knowledge to survive so much to survive anymore though as to satisfy our curiosity, so it brings about questions like "how long has our species existed?". As I said though we can not really answer that question; Sadly though the only thing we can know for absolute certainty is that we really know nothing.
I think it's cool you mentioned water affecting carbon dating. The flood could have changed the C14, everything being underwater seems like it would.
First of all, evolution was disproven 100 years ago, it breaks down on it's smallest level with the flagella and is filled with plenty of other holes. Scientist choose to believe in evolution because they won't accept creationtism which is the only other option, some even openly admit this.With creationtism, being the only option that could be possible, points to a creator. When I look at the things of nature it supports my faith, seeing its wonders, beauties and marvels makes me know how great and powerful my God is.
Animals are not spiritual beings and would have died. The Human body began to wither when sin entered the world, this I believe is why humans today use only around 10% of their brain, because it withered when sin entered.
I agree with all this, but about that last part, I have another outlook on that.... I believe that no one goes to hell or heaven when they die, according to both Christ's mention of people being "asleep"(1 Thessalonians 3:13-8), and studies have shown that many times "hell" is used in the bible as a word that really means "ground". And, his prophecy about the resurrection(i.e. this passage in Acts, said by Paul: "To this day I stand, witnessing both to small and great . . . that the Christ [the Messiah] would suffer, that He would be the first to rise from the dead"(Acts 26:22-23). , and this verse right here: John 3:13. I believe in a more merciful God than one that tortures people for eternity because of their mistakes.
In the bible it says our spirits go to heaven when we die. Our bodies will not be raised until The Second Coming.
well then tell where it says we go to heaven, cause John 3:13 shows me that we don't go to heaven. No offense there, sorry I just want to know where you got that.
